To get tax relief, one has to hold the shares for at least 3 years. No matter how good the stock might look now and it's future prospects for further growth, a time will come when it stops performing or tanks. This mostly happens before the 3 years are up and you are forced to make adjustments. You will be extremely lucky if all your stocks keep going up for 3 years. Almost half of your gains will go to tax. That is a waste of your time and money.
For that very reason I would just go for the Indi and chuck it in the bottom drawer.
1-Am I correct in assuming this advice is for someone who has no knowledge at all in investing in stocks aka me?Or is this just general info?
2-By "adjustments" do you mean selling?
3-This may be a silly question, Is there a small chance that the INDI will plateau in value in under 3 years?
Also,what is the price of the INDI per share right now?I still haven't figured out my interface as yet.
General info boet. I cannot see ALL my stocks surviving for 3 years without some major pullback. So I would rather go for the steady sustained gains with the Indi than go for the 130 percenters pa and have a major pullback and cannot sell due to the moerse gains made.
Point in question is my CML. Last bought at R24 and now at R82. Only held for 1.5 years and have R1.5M in it now. How much tax will I have to pay if I sell on a pullback to R60? At 40% tax, it is not worth it.
Holding on to STXIND that so far seems sustainable as it has been over many years albeit at 30% pa will be a better bet as you can hold it for the 3 year thing and pay very much less tax if you sell.
As much as I want to sell and buy the Indi, I cannot due to tax. I am stuck with CML.
I hate paying tax.