1
Shares / RA versus continued offshore investment / is the tax break really worth it?
« on: October 19, 2023, 10:40:59 am »
I am lucky enough to have gotten a kick into investing younger in life. Over the past 15 years, single stocks mostly in US tech have done really well for me but as I get older I tend to just build core positions in ETFs (global) with VOO / VT and QQQ being my anchor holdings
I am now back in SA after working in the EU for several years, I have been investigating the RA option with the main objective of SA tax optimization
My question:
I'm already gratefully in a position where I have a global stock/ETF portfolio. Should I rather take the disposable income and continue building that global portfolio with the view to retiring one day and drawing as optimally as possible off of that? this way is not restricted to "having to invest" in SA and can keep building in $
Or
Bite the bullet and open an RA with one of the low-cost options directly (Sygnia being the option for me) and use that disposable income to lower my effective tax payable annually
My somewhat simplistic view is that RA's being Reg 28 compliant places some limitations on holdings which might limit returns and at best you just beat out inflation, on retirement you get some payout Tax but the living annuity is still taxed as income so you kinda paying tax anyways which in my simple mind means that initial benefit is reversed to a certain extent, just later in life!
Appreciate your views!
I am now back in SA after working in the EU for several years, I have been investigating the RA option with the main objective of SA tax optimization
My question:
I'm already gratefully in a position where I have a global stock/ETF portfolio. Should I rather take the disposable income and continue building that global portfolio with the view to retiring one day and drawing as optimally as possible off of that? this way is not restricted to "having to invest" in SA and can keep building in $
Or
Bite the bullet and open an RA with one of the low-cost options directly (Sygnia being the option for me) and use that disposable income to lower my effective tax payable annually
My somewhat simplistic view is that RA's being Reg 28 compliant places some limitations on holdings which might limit returns and at best you just beat out inflation, on retirement you get some payout Tax but the living annuity is still taxed as income so you kinda paying tax anyways which in my simple mind means that initial benefit is reversed to a certain extent, just later in life!
Appreciate your views!